Research of the continuous scan test method for inlet in low wind tunnel
-
摘要: 在中国空气动力研究与发展中心FL–13风洞对进气道连续扫描低速风洞试验方法进行了初步研究。提出了进气道连续扫描试验方法和流程，给出了连续扫描试验数据处理方法，并在FL–13风洞开展了进气道常规试验方法与连续扫描试验方法的对比试验。两种方法试验结果一致性较好，所获得的进气道出口截面气动特性参数差值远小于国军标重复性精度要求。试验结果验证了进气道连续扫描试验方法的有效性和可行性。与进气道常规试验方法相比，连续扫描试验方法能够大幅度提高试验效率，同时还能够获得更多的有效试验数据。Abstract: The continuous scan test method for the inlet of airplane was studied in the FL–13 wind tunnel of CARDC. The test methods and procedures were proposed and the test data processing methods were also provided. Inlet tests were performed in the FL–13 wind tunnel to compare the conventional test method with the continuous scan test method. The test results with the continuous scan test method have a good consistency with the conventional test method, which verifies the availability and feasibility of the continuous scan test method for the inlet in the low speed wind tunnel. The research results show that the continuous scan test method can raise the tests efficiency and acquire more test data for the inlet test in the wind tunnel.
-
Key words:
- inlet test /
- wind tunnel test /
- continuous scan /
- test method /
- FL–13 wind tunnel
-
图 2 稳态周向畸变指数计算说明图
Figure 2. The schematic for calculating the circumference distort index
图 3 常规试验方法与连续扫描试验方法结果对比（α=−6°、0°，Ma=0.2，β=15°）
Figure 3. Comparison of the test results for conventional method and continuous scan method（α=−6°and 0°, Ma=0.2, β=15°）
图 4 常规试验方法与连续扫描试验方法结果对比（α=6°、12°，Ma=0.2，β=15°）
Figure 4. Comparison of the test results for conventional method and continuous scan method（α=6°and 12°, Ma=0.2, β=15°）
图 5 进发匹配点进气道性能参数随迎角变化曲线（Ma=0.2，β=15°）
Figure 5. The matching value of inlet performance varies with angle of attack（Ma=0.2, β=15°）
图 6 常规试验方法与连续扫描试验方法结果对比（α=−6°、0°，Ma=0.2，β=0°）
Figure 6. Comparison of the test results obtained by conventional method and continuous scan method（α=−6°and 0°, Ma=0.2, β=0°）
图 7 常规试验方法与连续扫描试验方法结果对比（α=6°、12°，Ma=0.2，β=0°）
Figure 7. Comparison of the test results obtained by conventional method and continuous scan method（α=6°and 12°, Ma=0.2, β=0°）
图 8 进发匹配点进气道性能参数随迎角变化曲线（Ma=0.2，β=0°）
Figure 8. The matching value of inlet performance varies with angle of attack（Ma=0.2, β=0°）
表 1 大车状态进发匹配点处连续扫描与常规方法试验结果差值（Ma=0.2，β=15°）
Table 1. The difference value of matching value under cart condition for conventional method and continuous scan method（Ma=0.2, β=15°）
α/（°） φm差值 σm差值 Δσθm差值 Tum差值 Wm差值 −6 0.0002 0.0002 0.0001 −0.0004 −0.0003 0 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0001 0.0004 6 0.0002 0.0002 0.0001 −0.0002 −0.0002 12 0.0001 0.0001 −0.0003 −0.0002 −0.0005 国军标重复性精度要求 0.01 0.005 0.005 0.005 — 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 慢车状态进发匹配点处连续扫描与常规方法试验结果差值（Ma=0.2，β=15°）
Table 2. The difference value of matching value under idling condition for conventional method and continuous scan method（Ma=0.2, β=15°）
α/（°） φm差值 σm差值 Δσθm差值 Tum差值 Wm差值 −6 −0.0001 −0.0002 0 0 0 0 −0.0001 −0.0002 0 0 0.0001 6 0 0 −0.0001 0 −0.0001 12 0 0 −0.0002 0 −0.0002 国军标重复性精度要求 0.01 0.005 0.005 0.005 —
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 大车状态进发匹配点处连续扫描与常规方法试验结果差值（Ma=0.2，β=0°）
Table 3. The difference value of matching value under cart condition for conventional method and continuous scan method（Ma=0.2, β=0°）
ω/（°·s−1） α/（°） φm差值 σm差值 Δσθm差值 Tum差值 Wm差值 0.5 −6 −0.0001 −0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0002 0.2 −6 0.0002 0.0002 0.0000 0.0003 0.0002 0.5 0 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 −0.0002 −0.0001 0.2 0 −0.0001 0.0000 −0.0001 −0.0001 −0.0002 0.5 6 0.0001 0.0001 −0.0002 0.0000 −0.0002 0.2 6 0.0003 0.0004 −0.0002 0.0003 0.0001 0.5 12 0.0004 0.0005 −0.0003 −0.0001 −0.0005 0.2 12 0.0007 0.0008 −0.0004 −0.0002 −0.0005 国军标精度要求 0.01 0.005 0.005 0.005 —
下载: 导出CSV
表 4 慢车状态进发匹配点处连续扫描与常规方法试验结果差值（Ma=0.2，β=0°）
Table 4. The difference value of matching value under idling condition for conventional method and continuous scan method（Ma=0.2, β=0°）
ω/（°·s−1） α/（°） φm差值 σm差值 Δσθm差值 Tum差值 Wm差值 0.5 −6 0.0001 0.0002 0 −0.0001 −0.0001 0.2 −6 0.0001 0.0002 −0.0004 −0.0002 −0.0005 0.5 0 −0.0002 −0.0006 −0.0012 0.0004 −0.0008 0.2 0 0 0 −0.0005 0.0002 −0.0004 0.5 6 0 0 −0.0001 0 −0.0001 0.2 6 0 0.0001 0 −0.0001 −0.0001 0.5 12 0 −0.0001 −0.0002 −0.0001 −0.0003 0.2 12 0.0000 0.0000 −0.0001 −0.0001 −0.0001 国军标精度要求 0.01 0.005 0.005 0.005 —
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 鲍国华. 风洞特种实验[M]. 西安: 西北工业大学出版社, 1990. [2] 李周复. 风洞特种试验技术[M]. 北京: 航空工业出版社, 2010. [3] 姜健,于芳芳,赵海刚,等. 进气道/发动机相容性评价体系的完善与发展[J]. 科学技术与工程,2009,9(21):6474-6483. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2009.21.041JIANG J,YU F F,ZHAO H G,et al. Perfection and development of engine/intake compatibility evaluate criterion[J]. Science Technology and Engineering,2009,9(21):6474-6483. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2009.21.041 [4] 中国人民解放军总装备部军事训练教材编辑工作委员会. 低速风洞试验[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2002. [5] 高静,郝卫东,闫永昌,秦凤波,李斐. 进气道低速特性试验技术研究[J]. 流体力学实验与测量,2004,18(1):38-42. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9897.2004.01.009GAO J,HAO W D,YAN Y C,et al. Experimental investigation on low speed characteristics of inlet[J]. Experiments and Measurements in Fluid Mechanics,2004,18(1):38-42. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9897.2004.01.009 [6] 巫朝君,孔鹏,王勋年,等. 基于张线尾撑的进气道低速风洞试验技术研究[J]. 实验流体力学,2012,26(2):86-89. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9897.2012.02.019WU C J,KONG P,WANG X N,et al. The investigation of the inlet test technology based on wire sting support in low speed wind tunnel[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics,2012,26(2):86-89. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9897.2012.02.019 [7] 荣祥森,李方吉,赵清,等. 1.2 m风洞进气道分布式流量节流机构系统设计[J]. 自动化仪表,2021,42(2):24-27. doi: 10.16086/j.cnki.issn1000-0380.2020040036RONG X S,LI F J,ZHAO Q,et al. Design of the distributed flow regulation device system for 1.2 m wind tunnel inlet test[J]. Process Automation Instrumentation,2021,42(2):24-27. doi: 10.16086/j.cnki.issn1000-0380.2020040036 [8] 王磊,刘凯礼,陈勇,等. 民用飞机进气道低速大迎角性能风洞实验和数值计算分析[J]. 推进技术,2021,42(6):1235-1244. doi: 10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.200262WANG L,LIU K L,CHEN Y,et al. Wind tunnel test and numerical study on civil aircraft inlet performance under low speed and high angle of attack condition[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology,2021,42(6):1235-1244. doi: 10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.200262 [9] 高颖,赵海刚,暴鑫,等. 飞机进气道流场品质测量耙风洞校准试验研究[J]. 科学技术与工程,2015,15(18):235-238. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2015.18.041GAO Y,ZHAO H G,BAO X,et al. Measurement and characteristic analysis of inlet distortion rake of the airplane inlet in wind tunnel[J]. Science Technology and Engineering,2015,15(18):235-238. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2015.18.041 [10] 李方吉,赵清,樊建超,等. 进气道风洞试验分布式流量调节技术研究与试验验证[J]. 实验流体力学,2020,34(4):74-80. doi: 10.11729/syltlx20190022LI F J,ZHAO Q,FAN J C,et al. Technology research and test verification of distributed flow regulator for inlet test in wind tunnel[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics,2020,34(4):74-80. doi: 10.11729/syltlx20190022 [11] 巫朝君,聂博文,孔鹏,等. 战斗机进气道非定常性能试验技术[J]. 实验流体力学,2017,31(2):98-103. doi: 10.11729/syltlx20160027WU C J,NIE B W,KONG P,et al. Test technology on unsteady characteristics of inlet flow during fighter plane maneuvers[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics,2017,31(2):98-103. doi: 10.11729/syltlx20160027 [12] 樊建超,华杰,于昆龙,等. FL–24风洞埋入式进气道试验技术[J]. 实验流体力学,2008,22(1):92-94. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9897.2008.01.020FAN J C,HUA J,YU K L,et al. A test technique for submerged inlet model in FL–24 wind tunnel[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics,2008,22(1):92-94. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9897.2008.01.020 [13] 程松,刘晓晖,温渝昌. 大攻角连续扫描试验技术在某型号飞机上的应用[J]. 流体力学实验与测量,1999,13(4):27-31.CHENG S,LIU X H,WEN Y C. An application of the continuous scan technique to the high angle of attack fighter model test[J]. Experiments and Measurements in Fluid Mechanics,1999,13(4):27-31. [14] 张俊. 工程实用的飞行器低速风洞连续扫描试验技术研究[D]. 长沙: 国防科学技术大学, 2007.ZHANG J. Investigation of the continuous scan techniques in engineer to aircraft in low speed wind tunnel[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2007. [15] 顾艺,岑飞,温渝昌,等. 基于非接触测量技术的低速风洞连续扫描试验技术研究[J]. 实验流体力学,2013,27(5):98-104. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9897.2013.05.019GU Y,CEN F,WEN Y C,et al. Research about continuous scanning test technique based on non-contact measurement technique in low speed wind tunnel[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics,2013,27(5):98-104. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9897.2013.05.019 [16] 唐乔乔,张卫国,刘忠华,等. 8 m × 6 m风洞特大迎角机构连续扫描试验技术研究与应用[J]. 实验流体力学,2012,26(2):81-85. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9897.2012.02.018TANG Q Q,ZHANG W G,LIU Z H,et al. Research and application of the continuous scan technique to the high angle of attack equipment in 8m × 6m wind tunnel[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics,2012,26(2):81-85. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9897.2012.02.018 [17] 孙海生,祝明红,黄勇,等. Φ3.2 m风洞战斗机大迎角试验关键技术研究[J]. 实验流体力学,2011,25(3):50-55. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9897.2011.03.012SUN H S,ZHU M H,HUANG Y,et al. Key technique for high angle of attack test of fighter aircraft in Φ3.2 m low speed wind tunnel[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics,2011,25(3):50-55. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9897.2011.03.012 [18] 魏志,谢艳,吴军强,等. 连续变迎角测力试验技术在大型暂冲式跨声速风洞中的应用[J]. 实验流体力学,2011,25(4):99-102. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9897.2011.04.019WEI Z,XIE Y,WU J Q,et al. Application of continuous sweeping force measuring technology in large intermittent transonic wind tunnel[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics,2011,25(4):99-102. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9897.2011.04.019 [19] 孙海生,张晖,汤更生,等. 8 m × 6 m风洞特大迎角试验设备研制[J]. 实验流体力学,2009,23(1):70-73. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9897.2009.01.016SUN H S,ZHANG H,TANG G S,et al. The development of high angle of attack test equipment in the 8 m × 6 m low speed wind tunnel[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics,2009,23(1):70-73. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9897.2009.01.016 [20] 周平,陈天毅,王帆,等. 8 m × 6 m风洞特大迎角机构控制系统研制[J]. 实验流体力学,2011,25(3):78-81,96. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9897.2011.03.017ZHOU P,CHEN T Y,WANG F,et al. The control system design of the high attack angle mechanism for the 8 m × 6 m wind tunnel[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics,2011,25(3):78-81,96. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9897.2011.03.017 -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 70
- HTML全文浏览量: 56
- PDF下载量: 11
- 被引次数: 0
