分开排气系统特性校准试验研究

李秋锋; 李密; 高翔; 王定奇

doi:10.11729/syltlx20220056

分开排气系统特性校准试验研究

doi: 10.11729/syltlx20220056

中国飞行试验研究院，西安　710089

基金项目: ××基金（6141B05110201）

详细信息

作者简介:
李秋锋：（1989—），男，陕西旬邑人，硕士，工程师。研究方向：动力装置性能特性试飞技术。通信地址：陕西省西安市阎良区凌云路5号（710089）。E-mail：liqiufeng1989@126.com

通讯作者:
E-mail：liqiufeng1989@126.com

中图分类号: V211.6
计量
- 文章访问数: 125
- HTML全文浏览量: 54
- PDF下载量: 6
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-06-27
- 修回日期: 2022-10-12
- 录用日期: 2022-10-19
- 网络出版日期: 2022-12-06

Experimental study on characteristic calibration of separated exhaust system

Chinese Flight Test Establishment, Xi’an　710089, China

摘要

摘要: 飞行试验时，采用燃气发生器法间接获取航空发动机飞行推力。为提高飞行推力计算精度，需准确获取航空发动机排气系统特性。采用某大涵道比分开排气系统缩比模型开展了实验室校准箱吹风试验及数值仿真研究，结果表明：采用实验室校准箱吹风试验、数值仿真两种方法获取的单独内涵喷管特性趋势一致、数值接近，最大内涵喷管压比为1.44时，喷管流量和推力偏差分别为0.73%、0.18%；两种方法获取的内、外涵分开排气系统特性趋势一致、数值接近，最大外涵喷管压比为1.46时，喷管流量和推力偏差分别为0.64%、0.18%；对大涵道比分开排气系统物理模型与几何模型进行合理简化后，两种方法获取的分开排气系统特性偏差满足工程精度要求。
- 排气系统 /
- 喷管特性 /
- 校准 /
- 大涵道比
Abstract: In flight testing, the aeroengine flight thrust is indirectly obtained by the gas generator method. In order to improve the calculation accuracy of the flight thrust, it is necessary to accurately obtain the characteristics of the exhaust system. The laboratory calibration test and numerical simulation research were carried out by using the large bypass ratio separated exhaust system scale model. The results show that: the core nozzle characteristics obtained by the two methods are consistent, and the values are close. When the maximum core nozzle pressure ratio is 1.44, the deviations of the mass flow and the thrust are 0.73% and 0.18%, respectively; the characteristics of the separated exhaust system obtained by the two methods have the same trend and close values. When the max bypass nozzle pressure ratio equals 1.46, the deviations of the mass flow and the thrust are 0.64% and 0.18%, respectively; when the physical model and geometric model of the large bypass ratio separated exhaust system are reasonably simplified, the characteristic deviations of the separated exhaust system obtained by the two methods are in good agreement.
- exhaust system /
- nozzle characteristic /
- calibration /
- large bypass ratio

HTML全文

图 1 翼吊式气动布局示意图

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of pneumatic layout of wing crane

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 分开排气系统示意图

Figure 2. Schematic of separated exhaust system

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 分开排气系统试验模型剖面图

Figure 3. Separated exhaust system test model

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 数值模拟采用的简化几何模型

Figure 4. Simplified geometric model for numerical simulation of test model

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 校准箱试验设备

Figure 5. Calibration box test equipment

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 试验模型及附属结构示意图

Figure 6. Schematic of test model and auxiliary structure

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 计算域核心区网格分布

Figure 7. Grids in the core of computing domain

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 外涵喷管模拟模型网格设计

Figure 8. Grids of simulation model for bypass nozzle

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 内涵喷管模拟模型网格设计

Figure 9. Grids of simulation model for core nozzle

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 单独内涵喷管流量对比

Figure 10. Mass flow of single core nozzle

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 单独内涵喷管推力对比

Figure 11. Thrust of single core nozzle

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 内外涵喷管总流量对比

Figure 12. Mass flow of separated exhaust system

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 13 内外涵喷管总推力对比

Figure 13. Thrust of separated exhaust system

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 14 数值模拟的喷管轴向截面速度云图

Figure 14. Velocity contour for numerical simulation of nozzle axial section

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 15 数值模拟的喷管特征截面速度云图

Figure 15. Velocity contour for numerical simulation of nozzle characteristic section

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

L	流向特征尺寸
D	截面特征尺寸
NPR_cr	喷管临界压比
NPR	喷管压比
NPR₉	内涵喷管压比
NPR₁₉	外涵喷管压比
C_d	喷管流量系数
C_fg	喷管推力系数
C_fg9	内涵喷管推力系数
C_fg19	外涵喷管推力系数
F_G	推力/内外涵喷管总推力
F_G9	内涵喷管推力
F_G19	外涵喷管推力
F_{G, act}	内外涵喷管实际总推力
F_{G9, act}	内涵喷管实际推力
F_{G9, id, non}	内涵喷管无量纲理想推力
F_{G9, id}	内涵喷管理想推力
F_{G19, id}	外涵喷管理想推力
F_id	内外涵喷管理想总推力
F_{act, exp}	内外涵实际总推力（校准试验）
F_{act, cfd}	内外涵实际总推力（数值模拟）
ΔF_act	F_{act, cfd}与F_{act, exp}之间的偏差
W	流量
W_id	内外涵喷管理想总流量
W_{9, act}	内涵喷管实际流量
W_{19, act}	外涵喷管实际流量
W_{act, exp}	内外涵实际总流量（校准试验）
W_{act, cfd}	内外涵实际总流量（数值模拟）
ΔW_act	W_{act, cfd}与W_{act, exp}之间的偏差
W₉	内涵喷管流量
V₉	喷管出口速度
A₉	内涵喷管出口面积
p_s0	环境压力
p_s9	内涵喷管出口静压
p_t9	内涵喷管出口总压
p_t19	外涵喷管出口总压
T_t9	内涵喷管出口总温
k	绝热指数
S	系统偏差
B	固定偏差
t	测量值或计算结果
j	t的影响因素的总数
x_i	t的第i个影响因素
u_i	第i个因素对t的不确定度
U_t	t的不确定度
c_i	t对第i个因素的敏感系数

下载: 导出CSV

表 1 试验传感器采集精度

Table 1. Sensor precision

传感器	精度
压力传感器	±0.1%
温度传感器	±0.5 K
流量计	±0.05%
六分量测力天平	±0.03%

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 单独内涵喷管试验主要状态参数

Table 2. The core nozzle test parameter

NPR₉	p_t9 /kPa	T_t9 /K	W_{9, act} /（kg·s⁻¹）
1.08	107.7	299.3	0.202
1.10	109.4	298.4	0.226
1.12	111.4	298.4	0.259
1.14	113.0	298.4	0.282
1.16	115.2	298.4	0.307
1.19	118.5	298.5	0.334
1.23	122.3	298.4	0.357
1.28	127.6	298.2	0.379
1.37	135.9	298.3	0.408
1.44	142.9	298.2	0.431

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 内外涵喷管试验主要状态参数

Table 3. The separated exhaust system test parameter

NPR₁₉	NPR₉	p_t19 /kPa	p_t9 /kPa	T_t9 /K	W_{9, act} /（kg·s⁻¹）	W_{19, act}/（kg·s⁻¹）
1.02	1.004	100.6	99.2	274.9	0.031	0.350
1.07	1.015	105.5	100.3	276.6	0.065	0.662
1.14	1.040	112.4	102.8	278.3	0.109	0.915
1.22	1.079	120.1	106.6	280.2	0.157	1.131
1.29	1.113	127.7	109.9	281.9	0.198	1.321
1.37	1.140	135.8	112.6	283.8	0.230	1.509
1.46	1.193	143.8	117.8	285.6	0.269	1.670

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(44)

[1]	李新建, 齐海帆, 潘鹏飞. 某型分排涡扇发动机尾喷管特性影响参数研究[J]. 工程与试验, 2016, 56(1): 36–40,84. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-3407.2016.01.010 LI X J, QI H F, PAN P F. Research on influencing parameters of jet nozzle characteristic of a certain type of turbofan engine[J]. Engineering & Test, 2016, 56(1): 36–40,84. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-3407.2016.01.010
[2]	ASBURY S C, YETTER J A. Static performance of a wing-mounted thrust reverser concept[C]//Proc of the 34th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit. 1998: 3256. doi: 10.2514/6.1998-3256
[3]	高扬, 姜健, 屈霁云. 航空燃气涡轮发动机飞行推力确定[M]. 北京: 航空工业出版社, 2019.
[4]	刘晓波, 孙宗祥, 钟萍, 等. 国外航空发动机空气动力学研究概况[J]. 燃气涡轮试验与研究, 2013, 26(4): 58–62. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2620.2013.04.013 LIU X B, SUN Z X, ZHONG P, et al. An overview of aero-engine aerodynamics overseas research[J]. Gas Turbine Experiment and Research, 2013, 26(4): 58–62. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2620.2013.04.013
[5]	HOLST K R. A method for performance analysis of a ramjet engine in a free-jet test facility and analysis of performance uncertainty contributors[D]. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Knoxville, 2012.
[6]	ONERA. Annual report 2021[R/OL]. (2021) [2022-11-12]. https://www.onera.fr/sites/default/files/ressources_documentaires/RA-2021-VA.pdf.
[7]	MASSONNAT J-M, COTON T. Development in turbine testing at ONERA[C]//Proc of the 27th AIAA Aerodynamic Measurement Technology and Ground Testing Conference. 2010.
[8]	Modane-Avrieux Center of ONERA. BD2 Nozzle Thrust Measurement Bench[R/OL]. (2018) [2022-11-12]. https://www.onera.fr/sites/default/files/windtunnel/pdf/BD2%20test%20bench%20version%202018.pdf.
[9]	Modane-Avrieux Center of ONERA. TPS and nozzle mass flow and thrust measurements [R/OL]. (2004) [2022-11-12]. https://www.onera.fr/sites/default/files/windtunnel/pdf/S4B.pdf.
[10]	BURCHAM F W Jr. An investigation of two variations of the gas generator method to calculate the thrust of the afterburning turbofan engines installed in an F-111A airplane[R]. NASA TN D-6297, 1971.
[11]	KURTENBACH F J, BURCHAM F W Jr. Flight evaluation of a simplified gross thrust calculation technique using an F100 turbofan engine in an F-15 airplane[R]. NASA-TP-1782, 1981.
[12]	RAY R J, COBLEIGH B R, VACHON M J, et al. Flight test techniques used to evaluate performance benefits during formation flight[C]//Proc of the AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference and Exhibit. 2002: 4492. doi: 10.2514/6.2002-4492
[13]	何成军, 李建强, 黄江涛, 等. 非对称超声速喷管内流动分离非定常特性[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(1): 302–312. doi: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2020.24930 HE C J, LI J Q, HUANG J T, et al. Unsteadiness of flow separation in an asymmetric supersonic nozzle[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2022, 43(1): 302–312. doi: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2020.24930
[14]	刘福海, 朱荣, 董凯, 等. 拉瓦尔喷管结构模式对超音速射流流动特性的影响[J]. 工程科学学报, 2020, 42(S1): 54–59. doi: 10.13374/j.issn2095-9389.2020.03.15.s15 LIU F H, ZHU R, DONG K, et al. Effect of Laval nozzle structure on behaviors of supersonic oxygen jet flow field[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering, 2020, 42(S1): 54–59. doi: 10.13374/j.issn2095-9389.2020.03.15.s15
[15]	孙鹏, 周莉, 王占学. 出口宽高比对双涵道S弯喷管流动特性的影响[J]. 推进技术, 2022, 43(6): 122–132. doi: 10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.201033 SUN P, ZHOU L, WANG Z X. Effects of aspect ratio on flow characteristic of serpentine nozzle for turbofan[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2022, 43(6): 122–132. doi: 10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.201033
[16]	何成军, 李建强, 范召林, 等. 单边膨胀喷管内流动分离非定常特性[J]. 航空动力学报, 2019, 34(11): 2339–2346. doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2019.11.005 HE C J, LI J Q, FAN Z L, et al. Flow separation unsteadiness in single expansion ramp nozzle[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2019, 34(11): 2339–2346. doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2019.11.005
[17]	孙鹏, 周莉, 王占学, 等. 双S弯喷管的流固耦合特性研究[J]. 推进技术, 2022, 43(10): 158–167. doi: 10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.210349 SUN P, ZHOU L, WANG Z X, et al. Fluid-structure interaction characteristic of double serpentine nozzle[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2022, 43(10): 158–167. doi: 10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.210349
[18]	周莉, 孟钰博, 王占学. S弯收扩喷管流动特性数值研究[J]. 推进技术, 2021, 42(1): 103–113,2. doi: 10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.200271 ZHOU L, MENG Y B, WANG Z X. Numerical study on flow characteristics of serpentine convergent-divergent nozzle[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2021, 42(1): 103–113,2. doi: 10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.200271
[19]	汪文杰, 王占学, 周莉, 等. 大涵道比短舱/排气系统耦合影响的数值研究[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2019, 40(9): 1981–1987. WANG W J, WANG Z X, ZHOU L, et al. A numerical simulation on the coupled influence of the high bypass ratio nacelle and exhaust system[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2019, 40(9): 1981–1987.
[20]	张睿琳, 周莉, 王占学, 等. S弯喷管喷流噪声特性研究[J]. 推进技术, 2022, 43(7): 185–193. doi: 10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.210049 ZHANG R L, ZHOU L, WANG Z X, et al. Jet noise characteristics of S-shaped nozzle[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2022, 43(7): 185–193. doi: 10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.210049
[21]	罗明东, 吉洪湖, 黄伟, 等. 无加力涡扇发动机二元喷管的红外辐射特性实验[J]. 航空动力学报, 2006, 21(4): 631–636. doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2006.04.003 LUO M D, JI H H, HUANG W, et al. An experimental investigation on infrared radiation characteristics of 2-D nozzles of turbofan engine afterburner[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2006, 21(4): 631–636. doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2006.04.003
[22]	额日其太, 王强, 陈渭鹏. 两种涡扇发动机排气系统红外辐射特性的比较[J]. 推进技术, 2003, 24(4): 334–336,367. doi: 10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.2003.04.013 ERIQITAI, WANG Q, CHEN W P. Comparative investigation of the infrared characteristics for two exhaust systems of a turbofan engine[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2003, 24(4): 334–336,367. doi: 10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.2003.04.013
[23]	宫禹. 涡扇发动机排气系统红外隐身实验装置的总体设计及性能仿真研究[D]. 南京: 南京航空航天大学, 2007. GONG Y. Design and performance simulation of an experimental rig for infrared stealth research of exhaust system of a turbofan engine[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2007.
[24]	是介, 周莉, 史经纬, 等. 三轴承矢量喷管红外辐射特性[J]. 航空动力学报, 2022, 37(6): 1195–1205. doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20210268 SHI J, ZHOU L, SHI J W, et al. Infrared radiation signature of three bearing swivel nozzle[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2022, 37(6): 1195–1205. doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20210268
[25]	蒋建峰, 征建生. 锯齿矢量喷管气动和红外辐射特性研究[J]. 激光与红外, 2022, 52(2): 234–239. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5078.2022.02.014 JIANG J F, ZHENG J S. Research on aerodynamic and infrared signature of vectoring nozzle with chevron[J]. Laser & Infrared, 2022, 52(2): 234–239. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5078.2022.02.014
[26]	宋宇, 杨青真, 高翔, 等. 介质涂覆位置对二元塞式喷管的电磁散射特性影响[J]. 推进技术, 2022, 43(11): 161–168. doi: 10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.210509 SONG Y, YANG Q Z, GAO X, et al. Electromagnetic scattering characteristics of binary plug nozzle with coating medium at different part[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2022, 43(11): 161–168. doi: 10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.210509
[27]	高翔, 高扬, 朱彦伟. 某型混合排气涡扇发动机喷管特性计算方法研究[J]. 机械研究与应用, 2017, 30(1): 1–4. doi: 10.16576/j.cnki.1007-4414.2017.01.001 GAO X, GAO Y, ZHU Y W. Study on nozzle characteristics computation method of a mixed exhaust turbofan engine[J]. Mechanical Research & Application, 2017, 30(1): 1–4. doi: 10.16576/j.cnki.1007-4414.2017.01.001
[28]	高翔, 高扬, 李密. 基于响应面法的混合排气涡扇发动机喷管特性研究[J]. 航空科学技术, 2016, 27(11): 19–24. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5453.2016.11.004 GAO X, GAO Y, LI M. Research on nozzle characteristics of a mixed exhaust turbofan engine based on response surface methodology[J]. Aeronautical Science & Technology, 2016, 27(11): 19–24. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5453.2016.11.004
[29]	邵万仁. 基于数值模拟的轴对称矢量喷管内流特性研究[J]. 航空动力学报, 2008, 23(5): 52–59. doi: 110.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2008.05.009 SHAO W R. Study of internal performance for an axisymmetric vectoring exhaust nozzle using numerical simulation[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2008, 23(5): 52–59. doi: 110.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2008.05.009
[30]	李秋锋, 李密, 王定奇. 测量耙对小尺寸发动机性能影响的研究[J]. 测控技术, 2022, 41(3): 38–43. doi: 10.19708/j.ckjs.2022.03.007 LI Q F, LI M, WANG D Q. Research on the effect of measuring rake on performance of the small-size engine[J]. Measurement & Control Technology, 2022, 41(3): 38–43. doi: 10.19708/j.ckjs.2022.03.007
[31]	李宁. 二元矢量喷管气动特性数值模拟[C]//北京力学会第二十三届学术年会会议论文集. 2017: 147-150.
[32]	王殿磊, 叶留增, 汪东, 等. 不同宽高比的二元收–扩喷管内流特性数值研究[C]//探索创新交流(第7集)——第七届中国航空学会青年科技论坛文集(上册). 2016: 365-369.
[33]	白伟, 高为民, 任智博, 等. 喷管面积比对推力矢量发动机特性的影响[J]. 航空动力学报, 2021, 36(7): 1426–1433. doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20210129 BAI W, GAO W M, REN Z B, et al. Influences of nozzle area ratio on thrust vector engine characteristic[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2021, 36(7): 1426–1433. doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20210129
[34]	汤伟, 刘李涛, 陈洪, 等. 矢量喷管推力特性的风洞试验技术[J]. 航空动力学报, 2018, 33(4): 858–864. doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2018.04.011 TANG W, LIU L T, CHEN H, et al. Thrust characteristics test technique of vectoring nozzle in wind tunnel[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2018, 33(4): 858–864. doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2018.04.011
[35]	陈雪冬, 唐贵明, 王发民. 用于脉冲风洞的热喷流实验方法初步研究[C]//第八届全国实验流体力学学术会议论文集, 2010: 195-204.
[36]	B. A. 索苏诺夫, B. M. 切普金. 航空发动机和动力装置的原理、计算及设计[Z]. 莫斯科国立航空学院, 2003: 424-423.
[37]	史经纬. 固定几何气动矢量喷管流动机理及性能评估技术研究[D]. 西安: 西北工业大学, 2015. SHI J W. Investigation on flow mechanism and performance estimation of fixed-geometric thrust vectoring nozzle[D]. Xi'an: Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2015.
[38]	ABERNETHY R B, ADAMS G R, ASCOUGH J C, et al. In-flight thrust determination[R]. SAE AIR 1703, 1986: 48-54.
[39]	廉筱纯, 吴虎. 航空发动机原理[M]. 西安: 西北工业大学出版社, 2005: 16-17.
[40]	李秋锋, 李密, 高翔. 测量耙对尾喷管内流流场性能参数的影响[J]. 现代机械, 2017(6): 29–33. doi: 10.13667/j.cnki.52-1046/th.2017.06.008 LI Q F, LI M, GAO X. Influence of measurement rake on performance parameters of internal flow field in nozzle[J]. Modern Machinery, 2017(6): 29–33. doi: 10.13667/j.cnki.52-1046/th.2017.06.008
[41]	高扬. ARJ21–700飞机飞行推力确定(IFTD)技术论文[G]. 中国飞行试验研究院, 2011.
[42]	战培国. 美国AIAA风洞试验不确定度评定标准研究[J]. 标准科学, 2014(1): 68–71. ZHAN P G. Research on American AIAA standard of assessment uncertainty for wind tunnel testing[J]. Standard Science, 2014(1): 68–71.
[43]	朱新新, 隆永胜, 赵顺洪, 等. 基于总温探针的高精度总焓测量方法优化研究[J]. 实验流体力学,doi: 10.11729/syltlx20210149. ZHU X X, LONG Y S, ZHAO S H, et al. Optimization of total enthalpy measurement method based on the total temperature probe[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, doi: 10.11729/syltlx20210149.
[44]	ABERNETHY R B, ADAMS G R, STEURER J W. Uncertainty of in-flight thrust determination[R]. SAE AIR 1678, 1986: 23-26.