Design and construction progress of AVIC Φ1.0 m hypersonic wind tunnel
-
摘要: 航空工业1 m量级高超声速风洞(FL-64)是国内最新建设的一座暂冲自由射流式大口径常规高超声速风洞,采用吹引式运行方式,同时考虑到低动压试验需要,另建有真空抽气系统。详细介绍了FL-64风洞的总体性能指标、关键部段设计、流场校测和标模试验结果。风洞性能指标如下:模拟马赫数范围4.0~8.0;总压范围0.1~8.0 MPa;总温范围300~900 K;单位雷诺数范围3.3×106~4.6×107 m–1;有效运行时间不小于30 s。FL-64风洞与航空工业亚跨超三声速风洞(FL-60)可形成高低马赫数搭配,涵盖马赫数0.3~8.0的宽速域高超声速飞行器试验需求,特别是马赫数4.0的总焓模拟能力可与真实飞行条件匹配,为我国高马赫数飞行器研制提供有效的气动试验平台。Abstract: The 1 m hypersonic wind tunnel for the AVIC (FL-64) is the newly built blow down free jet type large-diameter conventional hypersonic wind tunnel in China. It adopts the blowing type operation mode, at the same time, considering the test requirements of low dynamic pressure, a vacuum exhaust system is also equipped. The overall performance, key component design, flow field calibration and preliminary standard model test results of the FL-64 wind tunnel are presented in detail. The performance of the wind tunnel are as follows: the range of Mach number: 4.0 – 8.0; the total pressure range of the settling chamber: 0.1 – 8.0 MPa; the total temperature range of the settling chamber: 300 – 900 K; the unit Reynolds number range: 3.3×106 – 4.6×107 m–1; the effective operating time is not less than 30 s. The FL-64 wind tunnel combined the FL-60 trisonic (Subsonic, Transonic, Supersonic) wind tunnel forming the high and low Mach number range, this can cover the wide-speed range aircraft test with a Mach number of 0.3 – 8.0. Especially the duplication capability of the total enthalpy of Mach number 4.0 can match the real flight conditions. Overall, the successful completion of the FL-64 wind tunnel provide an effective test platform for the development of nation’s high Mach number aircraft.
-
Key words:
- hypersonic /
- large-scale wind tunnel /
- aerodynamic test /
- wind tunnel design /
- flow field calibration
-
表 1 世界主要1 m量级常规高超声速气动力风洞
Table 1. The 1 m conventional hypersonic aerodynamic wind tunnel in the world
风洞 所属
机构尺寸 Ma 总压
/MPa总温
/K加热
形式Tunnel A AEDC 1.00 m ×1.00 m 1.5~5.5 Tunnel B AEDC Φ1.27 m 6.0,8.0 0.140~5.800 388~750 电加热 Tunnel C AEDC Φ1.27 m 10.0,12.0 0.400~13.600 916~1250 电加热 Tunnel 9 AEDC Φ1.50 m 7.0,10.0~16.0 19.200 2028 T-116 TsAGI 1.00 m ×1.00 m 1.8~10.0 1075 电加热 Φ1.27 m JAXA Φ1.27 m 10.0 1.000~10.000 600~1200 卵石床 S4MA ONERA Φ1.00 m(0.67 m) 6.0,10.0,12.0 0.300~4.100 500~1843 卵石床 FD-20A CARDC Φ1.00 m 4.0~10.0 上限约12.000 上限约1100 电蓄热 FD-16 CAAA Φ1.20 m 5.0~10.0 0.074~10.000 350~1068 燃烧蓄热 FL-64 AVIC ARI Φ1.00 m 4.0~8.0 0.100~8.000 300~900 电蓄热 表 2 FL-64风洞Ma=5.0流场校测结果
Table 2. Flow field calibration results of Ma=5.0
x/mm 50 195 340 485 630 所有截面
的平均值$\overline {Ma} $ 5.047 5.055 5.048 5.051 5.048 5.050 $|\Delta M{a_{{\infty _{\max }}}}| $ 0.038 0.026 0.029 0.029 0.029 0.030 ${\sigma _{M{a_\infty }}} $ 0.0095 0.0087 0.0111 0.0107 0.0115 0.0103 $\dfrac{ {|\Delta M{a_{ {\infty _{\max } } } }|} }{ {M{a_\infty } } }$ 0.81% 0.52% 0.59% 0.58% 0.57% 0.61% 表 3 FL-64风洞Ma=6.0流场校测结果
Table 3. Flow field calibration results of Ma=6.0
x/mm 50 195 340 485 630 所有截面
的平均值$\overline {Ma} $ 6.035 6.031 6.035 6.039 6.036 6.036 $ |\Delta M{a_{ {\infty _{\max } } } }| $ 0.059 0.032 0.030 0.034 0.037 0.039 ${\sigma _{M{a_\infty } } } $ 0.0132 0.0105 0.0113 0.0134 0.0116 0.0120 $\dfrac{ {|\Delta M{a_{ {\infty _{\max } } } }|} }{ {M{a_\infty } } } $ 0.98% 0.53% 0.50% 0.57% 0.62% 0.64% -
[1] GRAY J D, LINDSAY E. Force tests of standard hypervelo-city ballistic models HB-l and HB-2 at Mach 1.5 to 10[R]. AEDC-TDR-64-137, 1964. [2] VANDERCREEK C, SMITH M, YU K. Focused schlieren and deflectometry at AEDC hypervelocity wind tunnel no.9 [R]. AIAA-2010-4209, 2010. doi: 10.2514/6.2010-4209 [3] KUCHI-ISHI S, WATANABE S, NAGAI S, et al. Compara-tive force/heat flux measurements between JAXA hypersonic test facilities using standard model HB-2(part 1: 1.27 m hyper-sonic wind tunnel results)[R]. JAXA-RR-04-035E, 2005. [4] 许晓斌. 常规高超声速风洞与试验技术[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2005. [5] 孙勇堂,赵之平,石运军,等. CAAA新建Φ1.2米常规高超声速风洞[C]//中国力学大会−2017暨庆祝中国力学学会成立60周年大会论文集. 2017. [6] 徐翔,程克明,王志坚,等. 南航Φ0.5 m高超声速风洞流场校测[J]. 实验流体力学,2009,23(4):77-81. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9897.2009.04.016XU X,CHENG K M,WANG Z J,et al. Flow field calibration of NUAA Φ0.5 m hypersonic wind tunnel[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics,2009,23(4):77-81. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9897.2009.04.016 [7] 刘中臣,钱战森,冷岩,等. 声爆近场空间压力风洞测量技术[J]. 航空学报,2020,41(4):123596. doi: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2019.23596LIU Z C,QIAN Z S,LENG Y,et al. Wind tunnel measure-ment techniques for sonic boom near-field pressure[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica,2020,41(4):123596. doi: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2019.23596 [8] 高亮杰,钱战森,王璐,等. 高马赫数低噪声风洞层流喷管设计与性能评估[J]. 航空科学技术,2016,27(8):68-78.GAO L J,QIAN Z S,WANG L,et al. Design and performan-ce evaluation for high Mach number low noise wind tunnel nozzle[J]. Aeronautical Science & Technology,2016,27(8):68-78.