Singularity distribution entropy analysis of impulsive acoustic signals
-
摘要: 为了对低信噪比复杂环境下脉冲信号的奇异性差异进行有效的分析和标定,提出了一种基于模极大值理论的奇异性分布熵特征分析模型。首先对脉冲信号进行归一化并进行小波变换,计算各尺度下模极大值及其特定分布,可以体现具有奇异性差异的模极大值曲线族。为定量描述这种差异性,用熵值表达构成模极大值曲线族的模极大值点分布,并构建能有效分析脉冲信号奇异性差异的奇异性分布熵特征模型。该模型能对低噪比下信号的奇异性差异进行刻画。实验结果表明,在信噪比为−6 dB的环境下对典型的直升机脉冲信号(桨/涡干扰信号和高速脉冲信号)进行分析,能够得到89.25%和87.63%的正确率。Abstract: In order to effectively analyze and calibrate the singularity difference of impulsive acoustic signals in complex environment with low signal-to-noise ratio, a singularity distribution entropy features analysis model based on the mode maximum theory is proposed. Firstly, the impulsive signal is normalized and wavelet transform is carried out to calculate the mode maximum and its specific distribution at each scale, which can reflect the family of mode maximum curves with singular differences. In order to describe the difference quantitatively, entropy is used to describe the distribution of the maximum points which constitute the family of modal maximum curves, and a singular distribution entropy feature model which can effectively analyze the singularity difference of impulsive signals is constructed. The model can describe the singularity difference of signals at low signal-to-noise ratio. Experiments show that the accuracy of 89.25% and 87.63% of typical helicopter impulsive signals (blade-vortex interaction signals and high-speed impulsive signals) can be obtained when the signal to noise ratio is −6dB.
-
表 1 BVI/HSI信号在Gaus1和Gaus2小波基函数时奇异性分布熵大小关系
Table 1. Singularity distribution entropy of BVI/HSI signals in Gaus1 and Gaus2 wavelet base functions
奇异性分布熵 小波基函数 :Gaus1 小波基函数 :Gaus2 BVI信号 大 小 HSI信号 小 大 -
[1] ROMANI G, CASALINO D. Rotorcraft blade-vortex interaction noise prediction using the Lattice-Boltzmann method[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2019, 88: 147–157. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2019.03.029 [2] TAYLOR R B. Helicopter rotor blade design for minimum vibration[R]. NASA-CR-3825, 1984. [3] PADFIELD G D. helicopter flight dynamics: the theory and application of flying qualities and simulation modeling[M]. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Pub, 2007. [4] KAPOOR R, RAMASAMY S, GARDI A, et al. Acoustic sensors for air and surface navigation applications[J]. Sensors, 2018, 18(2): 499. doi: 10.3390/s18020499 [5] MUHR P, JOHNSON A C, SELANDER J, et al. Noise exposure and hearing impairment in air force pilots[J]. Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance, 2019, 90(9): 757–763. doi: 10.3357/AMHP.5353.2019 [6] ZHAO Y Y, SHI Y J, XU G H. Helicopter blade-vortex interaction airload and noise prediction using coupling CFD/VWM method[J]. APPLIED SCIENCES, 2017, 7(4): 381. doi: 10.3390/APP7040381 [7] STEPHENSON J H, TINNEY C E, GREENWOOD E, et al. Time frequency analysis of sound from a maneuvering rotorcraft[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2014, 333(21): 5324–5339. doi: 10.1016/j.jsv.2014.05.018 [8] NARAYAN Y, KUMAR S. Pattern recognition of semg signals using dwt based feature and svm classifier[J]. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 2020, 29(10S): 2257–2266. [9] SAHOO S, KANUNGO B, BEHERA S, et al. Multiresolution wavelet transform based feature extraction and ECG classification to detect cardiac abnormalities[J]. Measurement, 2017, 108: 55–66. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2017.05.022 [10] GOUGAM F, RAHMOUNE C, BENAZZOUZ D, et al. Bearing faults classification under various operation modes using time domain features, singular value decomposition, and fuzzy logic system[J]. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2020, 12(10). doi: 10.1177/1687814020967874 [11] JIANG J J, MA J Y, CHEN C, et al. SuperPCA: a superpixelwise PCA approach for unsupervised feature extraction of hyperspectral imagery[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2018, 56(8): 4581–4593. doi: 10.1109/tgrs.2018.2828029 [12] POLACSEK C, ZIBI J, ROUZAUD O, et al. Helicopter rotor noise prediction using ONERA and DLR euler/kirchhoff methods[J]. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 1999, 44(2): 121–131. doi: 10.4050/jahs.44.121 [13] KENNETH, S, BRENTNER. Prediction of helicopter rotor discrete frequency noise for three scale models[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1988. doi: 10.2514/3.45598 [14] BRENTNER K S, BRES G A, PEREZ G, et al. Maneuvering rotorcraft noise prediction: a new code for a new problem[C]//Proc of AHS Aerodynamics, Acoustics and Test Evaluation Specialist Meeting. 2022. [15] MALLAT S, HWANG W L. Singularity detection and processing with wavelets[J]. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 1992, 38(2): 617–643. doi: 10.1109/18.119727 [16] MALLAT S, ZHONG S. Characterization of signals from multiscale edges[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 1992, 14(7): 710–732. doi: 10.1109/34.142909 [17] SADLER B M, SWAMI A. Analysis of wavelet transform multiscale products for step detection and estimation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. 1999, 45(3): 1043-1051. doi: 10.1109/18.761341. [18] TU C L, HWANG W L, HO J. Analysis of singularities from modulus maxima of complex wavelets[J]. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2005, 51(3): 1049–1062. doi: 10.1109/TIT.2004.842706 [19] HSUNG T C, LUN D P K, SIU W C. Denoising by singularity detection[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 1999, 47(11): 3139–3144. doi: 10.1109/78.796450 [20] MIAO Q, HUANG H Z, FAN X F. Singularity detection in machinery health monitoring using Lipschitz exponent function[J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2007, 21(5): 737–744. doi: 10.1007/BF02916351 [21] FRIEDLANDER B, PORAT B. Detection of transient signals by the gabor representation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 1989, 37(2): 169–180. doi: 10.1109/29.21680