Flow field energy analysis of dynamic impinging stream reactor based on modal decomposition
-
摘要: 采用实验和理论分析相结合的方法,对动态撞击流反应器流场内的能量分布规律进行研究。借助TR–PIV(Time-Resolved Particle Image Velocimetry)技术对动态撞击流反应器内部流场进行测量,在不同喷嘴间距与喷嘴内径比值L/d、平均出口速率及出口速率差条件下,考察了反应器内部流场的流动结构和流场能量。将动态撞击流反应器内二维速度场进行本征正交分解,提取出流场不同尺度拟序结构及不同本征模态下的能量特征,流场大尺度相干结构分布于径向射流区和两侧喷嘴上下近壁面处。随着L/d增大,反应器内部流场低阶模态含能量先增大后减小,L/d = 4时,流场能量最高;反应器内部流场低阶模态含能量随平均出口速率和出口速率差增大而增大。在动态出口速度条件下,反应器内部流场能量更高,流场大尺度相干结构更为明显,显著强化了流场内的动量交换,有利于提高混合效果。Abstract: The study investigates the energy distribution patterns within the flow field of a dynamic impact stream reactor through a combination of experimental and theoretical analysis. The flow field inside the dynamic impact stream reactor is measured using TR–PIV (Time-Resolved Particle Image Velocimetry) technology. Various nozzle spacings, different outlet mean velocities, and different outlet velocity differences are examined to understand the flow structure and energy distribution within the reactor. By performing eigenvalue orthogonal decomposition on the two-dimensional velocity field within the dynamic impact stream reactor, different scale quasi-ordered structures within the flow field and energy characteristics under different eigenmodes are extracted. Large-scale coherent structures in the flow field are distributed in the radial jet region and near the wall surface below the two nozzles. The energy of low-order modes in the reactor's flow field initially increases and then decreases as the nozzle spacing increases, with the highest energy proportion observed at a nozzle spacing of L/d = 4. The energy also increases with increasing outlet mean velocity and outlet velocity difference. Under dynamic outlet conditions, the energy proportion in the flow field of the impact stream reactor is higher, and the large-scale coherent structures in the flow field are more pronounced. This significantly enhances momentum exchange within the flow field, contributing to improved mixing efficiency.
-
表 1 实验工况
Table 1. Experimental condition setting
Nozzle d/mm vd/(m·s−1) va/(m·s−1) L/d Left, Right 10 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7 3, 4, 5 表 2 前6阶POD模态相对能量贡献率的衰减量
Table 2. The attenuation of the relative energy contribution rate of the first 6 POD modes
Decay of relative
contributionva/(m·s−1) 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 (n1 − n2)/n1 27.0% 33.0% 35.0% 39.0% 45.0% (n2 − n3)/n1 16.0% 9.7% 19.0% 17.0% 16.0% (n3 − n4)/n1 10.0% 14.0% 9.5% 11.0% 8.9% (n4 − n5)/n1 5.3% 5.4% 6.3% 6.7% 10.7% (n5 − n6)/n1 2.3% 5.3% 2.8% 5.0% 3.0% -
[1] DONG B, QIAN H L, XUE C Y, et al. Controllable synthesis of hierarchical micro/nano structured FePO4 particles under synergistic effects of ultrasound irradiation and impinging stream[J]. Advanced Powder Technology, 2020, 31(10): 4292–4300. doi: 10.1016/j.apt.2020.09.002 [2] THUWAPANICHAYANAN R, KUMKLAM P, SOPONRONNARIT S, et al. Mathematical model and energy utilization evaluation of a coaxial impinging stream drying system for parboiled paddy[J]. Drying Technology, 2022, 40(1): 158–174. doi: 10.1080/07373937.2020.1775640 [3] TSAOULIDIS D, ORTEGA E G, ANGELI P. Intensified extraction of uranium(VI) in impinging-jets contactors[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018, 342: 251–259. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.02.049 [4] LIAN Z Y, ZHANG Y, WANG X Z. Manufacturing of high quality hydrotalcite by computational fluid dynamics simulation of an impinging jet crystallizer[J]. Ceramics International, 2022, 48(11): 15470–15482. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.02.081 [5] WANG Y, WANG Y, LIU Y X. Fe2 + /heat-coactivated PMS oxidation-absorption system for H2S removal from gas phase[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2022, 286: 120458. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2022.120458 [6] ZHANG J W, HE Z Y, SHA X L, et al. Hilbert-Huang transform analysis of the concentration field of a two-layer impinging stream mixer[J]. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 2022, 45(9): 1614–1622. doi: 10.1002/ceat.202200142 [7] 张建伟, 许仲荟, 董鑫, 等. 双组分层撞击流反应器浓度场混沌分析[J]. 过程工程学报, 2022, 22(6): 802–810. doi: 10.12034/j.issn.1009-606X.221180ZHANG J W, XU Z H, DONG X, et al. Chaos analysis of concentration field in two-component layered impinging stream reactor[J]. The Chinese Journal of Process Engineering, 2022, 22(6): 802–810. doi: 10.12034/j.issn.1009-606X.221180 [8] BERKOOZ G, HOLMES P, LUMLEY J L. The proper orthogonal decomposition in the analysis of turbulent flows[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 1993, 25: 539–575. doi: 10.1146/annurev.fl.25.010193.002543 [9] PASTRANA H, TREVIÑO C, PÉREZ-FLORES F, et al. TR-PIV measurements of turbulent confined impinging twin-jets in crossflow[J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2022, 136: 110667. doi: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2022.110667 [10] TORRES P, GONCALVES N D, FONTE C P, et al. Proper orthogonal decomposition and statistical analysis of 2D confined impinging jets chaotic flow[J]. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 2019, 42(8): 1709–1716. doi: 10.1002/ceat.201900050 [11] CHEN W H, LIU J J, LI J Y, et al. Assessment of a confined thermal plume by PIV combined with POD analysis[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2021, 188: 116590. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2021.116590 [12] 张建伟, 张学良, 冯颖, 等. 水平对置撞击流的POD分析及混合特性[J]. 过程工程学报, 2016, 16(1): 26–33. doi: 10.12034/j.issn.1009-606X.215319ZHANG J W, ZHANG X L, FENG Y, et al. POD analysis and mixing characteristics of impinging streams from two opposite nozzles[J]. The Chinese Journal of Process Engineering, 2016, 16(1): 26–33. doi: 10.12034/j.issn.1009-606X.215319 [13] LI C, YUE S, LI M. Numerical simulation of the drying characteristics of a high-moisture particle in a dynamic asymmetric impinging stream reactor[J]. Chemical Papers, 2022, 76(1): 41–56. doi: 10.1007/s11696-021-01832-3 [14] QIU S X, XU P, JIANG Z T, et al. Numerical modeling of pulsed laminar opposed impinging jets[J]. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 2012, 6(2): 195–202. doi: 10.1080/19942060.2012.11015414 [15] 刘雪晴. 动态非对称撞击流反应器流动特性研究[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2019.LIU X Q. Study on flow characteristics of dynamic asymmetric impinging stream reactor[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2019. [16] SIROVICH L. Turbulence and the dynamics of coherent structures. I. Coherent structures[J]. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, 1987, 45(3): 561–571. doi: 10.1090/qam/910462